scholarly journals Influence of a Large Late Summer Precipitation Event on Food Limitation and Grasshopper Population Dynamics in a Northern Great Plains Grassland

2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 686-695 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Branson
2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1203-1217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven M. Quiring ◽  
Daria B. Kluver

Abstract On the basis of snowfall observations from 1929 to 1999, positive (negative) snowfall anomalies are associated with wetter (drier) than normal conditions during the summer [July–August (JJA)] in the northern Great Plains. The five driest summers are associated with negative snowfall anomalies during the preceding winter (−66.7 mm) and spring (−62.4 mm) that cover most of the study region (∼85%). Snowfall anomalies during the late spring (April–May) are more important for determining summer moisture conditions than snowfall anomalies in fall [September–November (SON)] or winter [December–February (DJF)]. The link between snowfall anomalies and summer moisture conditions appears to be, at least partly, through soil moisture since positive (negative) snowfall anomalies are associated with wetter (drier) soils, a later (earlier) date of snowmelt, cooler (warmer) air temperatures, and more (less) evaporation during spring and summer. However, the relationship between spring snowfall and summer moisture conditions is only statistically significant when the moisture anomaly index (Z), which accounts for both temperature and precipitation, is used to characterize summer moisture conditions and the signal is weak when just considering precipitation (e.g., standardized precipitation index). Results also indicate that the strength of the relationship between winter/spring snowfall and summer moisture varies significantly over space and time, which limits its utility for seasonal forecasting.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rose J. Swift ◽  
Michael J. Anteau ◽  
Kristen S. Ellis ◽  
Megan M. Ring ◽  
Mark H. Sherfy ◽  
...  

Plant Disease ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 82 (12) ◽  
pp. 1404-1404
Author(s):  
J. A. Walla ◽  
Y. H. Guo

Lilac witches'-broom (LWB), caused by the ash yellows (AshY) phytoplasma, was identified in common lilac (Syringa vulgaris L.) in Cass and Ransom counties in southeast North Dakota in 1997 and 1998. The infected plants were immature, naturally regenerating lilac in the understory of three 57- and 58-year-old Prairie States Forestry Project windbreaks that have lilac as a planted component. In late summer and early fall of 1997, the terminal ends of hardened-off, current-season shoots on more than 100 immature plants were dead, and two to three succulent, late-season shoots were present just below the dead tips. Succulent shoots collected from one such plant in each of two of the windbreaks (both in Ransom Co.) were positive for the AshY phytoplasma, using immunofluorescence (IF) with an AshY phytoplasma-specific monoclonal antibody (1). One of those shoots was also positive with a universal phytoplasma-specific primer pair (R16F2/R2) (2) in a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Succulent shoots from a plant in the third windbreak (in Cass Co.) were IF negative. In late spring of 1998, more than 100 young plants in two of the same windbreaks (one each in Cass and Ransom counties) had abnormal shoot growth, including combinations of yellow, distorted leaves, multiple shoots, and twig dieback. A shoot from one of two plants sampled in the Ransom Co. windbreak was IF positive. Roots from two of four plants sampled in the Cass Co. windbreak were IF positive, while the other root samples and shoot samples from the same four plants were IF negative. A shoot from one of the IF positive plants was positive for phytoplasmas in a PCR. Witches'-brooms were not observed in the planted lilacs. This is the first report of LWB in North Dakota and in the Great Plains region of North America. While the AshY phytoplasma is known in green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh.) in the Great Plains, this report documents substantial extension of the known range of LWB westward from Wisconsin (3). Lilac is a very important shrub in both rural and urban plantings in the northern Great Plains and is the most commonly planted shrub in North Dakota. With this report, LWB should be considered among the possible damaging agents in lilac in this region. References: (1) Y. H. Guo and T. A. Chen. Phytopathology 83:243, 1993. (2) I.-M. Lee et al. Phytopathology 83:834, 1993. (3) W. A. Sinclair et al. Plant Dis. 80:468, 1996.


1991 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 709-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Boe ◽  
E. K. Twidwell ◽  
K. D. Rephart

Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] and mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] are summer-annual legumes which have potential as forages in the northern Great Plains region of the USA during late summer when cool-season grass pastures decline in productivity. The objective of this study was to evaluate forage yield and growth response of these species when grown under different row spacings and planting rates. Victor cowpea and Berken mungbean were planted at 500 000 pure live seeds (PLS) ha−1 in row spacings of 25, 50, and 75 cm at two South Dakota locations in 1987. In 1988 the two species were planted at rates of either 250 000 or 500 000 PLS ha−1 in the same row spacings at three locations. Cowpea produced higher forage yields than mungbean at all locations in both years. Yields of both species decreased with increased row spacing. Species did not differ in plant weight, but plant number per unit of harvested area was greater for cowpea than mungbean. Forage yield was not significantly affected by planting rate at any location in 1988; however, plant weight, leaflets plant−1, and leaf area plant−1 were significantly greater for the low rate, showing that forage yield remained relatively constant across wide variations in plant population. Results indicate that both cowpea and mungbean have potential as summer annual forage crops. However, the consistently higher yield performance of the cowpea cultivar suggests that it was better adapted than the mungbean cultivar to the northern Great Plains region and consequently should be a better forage crop. Key words: Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp., Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek, yield, plant density, cowpea, mungbean


2007 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 904-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Tanaka ◽  
J. M. Krupinsky ◽  
S. D. Merrill ◽  
M. A. Liebig ◽  
J. D. Hanson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document